To @tdbonney since he refuses to be open to anyone who disagrees with him, I'll make this reply public:

Had Paul stopped with the men, Mr. Bonney would have a case. However, Mr. Bonney conveniently ignores verse 26 of the passage he's trying to distort: "For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature…" (and yes, I also look at the Greek and Hebrew; I'd be happy to engage in the word studies with you, but in your excessive and frankly sinful pride that you think you're the only right person in the room, you seem to have shut everyone else out). The additional reference to the women as well as the men shuts down his argument almost from the start.

The Romans viewed homosexual relationships much like they viewed war, in terms of the dominant and the submissive, and the most common kind of male homosexual relationship in that period was a dominant lead with a submissive or "effeminate" (female-acting) younger male (which is how some English bibles render μαλακοι in 1 Cor. 6:9 in lieu of "men who practice homosexuality"). Again, put it back into the context, and the message is plain. Last I checked, men having relations with other men is homosexuality regardless of the age of the participants; age merely determines when said homosexuality is also paedophilia (which, by the way, the Romans tolerated but heavily frowned upon well before Christianity was introduced into the equation).

Going back to Romans 1, the entire section is a progression of humanity does this without God, therefore God lets then go into their own depravity and suffer the consequences of it:

• Humanity refuses to honor God and instead worships creation rather than the creator (vv. 21-23);
• Therefore God gives them up to their own lusts (v. 24);
• Humanity then exchanges truth for a lie and serves the creature (themselves) rather than the creator (v. 25);
• Therefore God gives them up to dishonorable passions, which include women "exchanging natural relations for those that are contrary to nature" and men "[giving] up natural relations with women ... consumed with passion for one another" and "receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error" (vv. 26-27) "giving up natural relations with women" in favor of "other men" is clearly descriptive of same-sex sexual relationships
• Humanity does not see fit to acknowledge God (v. 28a);
• Therefore God gives them up to a "debased mind to do what ought not to be done" (v. 28b), the attributes of which are listed in vv. 29-31—not only that, but "give[s] approval to those who practice them"; the consequences of which are that humanity "deserve[s] to die" (v. 34).

Keep going through Chapters 2, 3, and 4, and Paul undertakes a systematic takedown of both gentile and Jewish morality and law (the gentiles may not have the Law, but they are still a law to themselves), concluding that neither can claim any righteous standing before God apart from Jesus Christ (3:21), which he then affirms in Chapter 5.